On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 01:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to > > > achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote) > > > > > What makes you think that no community input is considered? > > Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input? > >From whom it was gathered? > What was the question? > What was the answer? > > - Gilboa > > Most likely by reading or participating in the various threads on subjects that have happened on this list and the FAB list and the desktop list and others. It seems to be a rather big assumption that board decisions are made in a vacuum. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
