On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:30 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > OK, bad example, but you know what I mean. > > Yes, I do, and I think there is room for a Fedora offering that is > released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year, with > conservative updates to the platform. That's nearly exactly what we > have in Fedora Desktop. There is also room for a Fedora offering that > is released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year, > with aggressive updates to the latest and greatest for the platform. > That's nearly exactly what we have in Fedora KDE. > > The real problem is going to be when somebody wants to make an offering > that features GNOME but has aggressive updates to latest and greatest > GNOME on every update stream, as that cannot coexist with the > conservative Fedora Desktop. The other problem is if you'd like stable updates but you prefer KDE, or vice versa =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
