On Friday 07 August 2009 04:21:56 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:30 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > OK, bad example, but you know what I mean. > > > > Yes, I do, and I think there is room for a Fedora offering that is > > released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year, with > > conservative updates to the platform. That's nearly exactly what we > > have in Fedora Desktop. There is also room for a Fedora offering that > > is released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year, > > with aggressive updates to the latest and greatest for the platform. > > That's nearly exactly what we have in Fedora KDE. > > > > The real problem is going to be when somebody wants to make an offering > > that features GNOME but has aggressive updates to latest and greatest > > GNOME on every update stream, as that cannot coexist with the > > conservative Fedora Desktop. > > The other problem is if you'd like stable updates but you prefer KDE, or > vice versa =) Why do you expect that updating to the latest KDE means unstable system? ;-) > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
