On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 11:35 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > I definitely see what you're saying, and yeah, perhaps an issue is > > that > > we don't have enough of a separate identity for the separate spins. We > > don't have Kedora and Gedora (or Dedora, if you like ;>), we have > > Fedora...but still, there's enough updates pushed even in packages in > > the Desktop spin which wouldn't go through in a more conventionally > > defined update process (ask yourself if RHEL would ship 'em :>). > > That's not a useful argument. There is a huge difference between what > RHEL would ship, and a conservative bugfix update. RHEL typically > requires a paying customer contacting support about an issue, escalation > from there, 3 levels of ACK/NACK decisions, and finally gobs of QA on a > package before it ever goes out. Vastly different than what we do in > Fedora, even for conservative updates. OK, bad example, but you know what I mean. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
