On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 11:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I definitely see what you're saying, and yeah, perhaps an issue is > that > we don't have enough of a separate identity for the separate spins. We > don't have Kedora and Gedora (or Dedora, if you like ;>), we have > Fedora...but still, there's enough updates pushed even in packages in > the Desktop spin which wouldn't go through in a more conventionally > defined update process (ask yourself if RHEL would ship 'em :>). That's not a useful argument. There is a huge difference between what RHEL would ship, and a conservative bugfix update. RHEL typically requires a paying customer contacting support about an issue, escalation from there, 3 levels of ACK/NACK decisions, and finally gobs of QA on a package before it ever goes out. Vastly different than what we do in Fedora, even for conservative updates. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
