On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:27 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > Perhaps we're failing to define a update policy because we have wildly > divergent audiences, and we should be allowing SIGs that cater to these > audiences define the policy that best suites their respective > constituents. Defining "Fedora" is so darned hard because it's > different things to so many different people. Diving down a bit deeper > and defining Fedora Desktop vs Fedora KDE gets a bit easier to do. I definitely see what you're saying, and yeah, perhaps an issue is that we don't have enough of a separate identity for the separate spins. We don't have Kedora and Gedora (or Dedora, if you like ;>), we have Fedora...but still, there's enough updates pushed even in packages in the Desktop spin which wouldn't go through in a more conventionally defined update process (ask yourself if RHEL would ship 'em :>). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
