On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:29:17PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Just to clarify: Ulf agreed on compatible way for proof of concept and > asked to send a code so everyone can understand better what you are > making. I don't recall any Linaro policy or answer. > > After above email, other people proposed other solutions and disagreed > with that statement, so no, you do not have a consensus. > > Trying to present this as a consensus if way exaggerated. > > You have no conclusion, because talk is cheap and this thread is way too > big. It's also way to vague, like we had to poke you for several emails > to get hardware description. I still don't recall it, but TBH, I am not > going to look at 50 email thread for one email. > > Therefore, feel free to propose something, but if you call it "that was > the consensus from community" then please already add there my > Nacked-by, because there was no consensus. > > In your proposal finally describe your hardware, firmware and problem > which you are solving (because no one will be going back to this thread). > I can't agree more, well summarised. Nikunj, Sorry I read this email after I responded to you, so please ignore my suggestion on starting a fresh thread, follow Krzysztof's suggestion instead. But all other points in my email still stands. -- Regards, Sudeep
