On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 03:41:40PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > > On 19/03/2024 15:17, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > I am not debating on the implementation just to be clear. I accept changes > > might be needed there. The $subject is all about DT bindings and what need > > to be changes and for me nothing, just use existing bindings and if there > > are issues there, let us discuss it with specifics. > > > How can changes to dt bindings be nothing? All the resources > clk/regulators/resets will become optional and a new power or perf domain > will become required for each device with firmwares that support SCMI Perf. > Correct, sorry to miss the point that few properties are now optional from mandatory before. Very good point. I was so caught up with the addition of the new "firmware controlled blah blah" property/compatible that I missed to observe mandatory->optional as a change. Thanks for correcting me. -- Regards, Sudeep
