Re: DT Query on "New Compatible vs New Property"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:24:02AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> 
> On 4/10/2024 10:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 10/04/2024 18:55, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> > > If there are no more questions on this and everyone is on the same page,
> > > I would like to conclude this thread in favor of using a new DT property
> > > 'qcom,firmware-managed-resources'.
> > Just to recap my earlier statement, because I am not sure if I got the
> > answer (if answer was provided, then I don't forgot... sorry):
> > 
> > This is a new hardware, so you have a new compatible, therefore any
> > additional property is not needed.
> This is not a new HW, this is the same HW with different FW and interface to
> FW is different too. As you can see earlier discussion on this thread, new
> compatible was ruled out since it is the same HW IP.

Can you link me to the post that ruled it out please?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux