Re: Updating to sagemath 6.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014-05-23 17:46 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 2014-05-22 22:23 GMT+02:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> 2014-05-22 17:13 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 2014-05-22 13:39 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> 2014-05-22 12:32 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>> On 17/05/14 17:39, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2014-05-16 21:23 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2014 12:37:19 -0300
>>>>>>>>> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>>>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi sorry for adding the CC, but trying hard to get you attention :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2014-05-15 16:50 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>>>>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    I am in the last steps on getting sagemath 6.2 working, so,
>>>>>>>>>>> what should be done:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    It would be better to coordinate the update, so...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> o Update to pari 2.7.0 -- optional
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    At least for sagemath it is ok to rebuild pari 2.7.0; I will use
>>>>>>>>>> this patch:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/sagemath/blob/master/sagemath-pari2.7.patch
>>>>>>>>>> and drop this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/sagemath-nopari2.6.patch
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Note that dist-git now has pari 2.7.1 but it's not built yet; that will
>>>>>>>>> change when the mass rebuild lands.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    For sagemath I can apply the patches to support pari 2.7 later, but
>>>>>>>> it probably would be better to build pari earlier. At least sagemath
>>>>>>>> is already broken for almost a month in rawhide due to other
>>>>>>>> dependencies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    Can you rebuild pari in the next few days please? This would also
>>>>>>>> ensure that the mass rebuild would not let pass broken packages
>>>>>>>> in case it builds packages that needs pari before pari itself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've now built pari 2.7.1 in Rawhide. I kept the old library around for now
>>>>>>> to avoid broken deps whilst packages are migrated to the new version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Many thanks! Major issue now for sagemath is ipython, that I hope should
>>>>>> be resolved and available soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> I got now the unbundling exception approved and want to update
>>>>> python-tornado after the mass rebuild is over. Then I'll update
>>>>> ipython as ipthon requires a newer python-tornado.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would also ipython 2.X be fine, or do you must have version 1.2.1?
>>>>> I was already working on the 2.X series before you were writing about
>>>>> version 1.2.1... :/
>>>>
>>>>   It starts and can start the notebook without problems, so I think it is safe.
>>>> Only one warning:
>>>>
>>>> ---%<---
>>>> $ sage
>>>> ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
>>>> │ Sage Version 6.2, Release Date: 2014-05-06                         │
>>>> │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface.        │
>>>> │ Type "help()" for help.                                            │
>>>> └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
>>>> WARNING: Hook shutdown_hook is deprecated. Use the atexit module instead.
>>>> sage:
>>>> ---%<---
>>>>
>>>>   I have no reasons to think it could cause problems.
>>>
>>> Great!
>>>
>>> I'll then now prepare the pyhton-tornado update for next week and next
>>> is ipython.
>>> Should I let you know, when I have a scratch build of ipython before
>>> updating it in rawhide, so you can do the final testings?
>>
>>   Usually, if it is going to fail it fails at start (all I got was the
>> warning), so I do
>> not believe there will be any issues. But it would be ok to know about a scratch
>> build and better yet when it is available in rawhide.
>
> I think the ipython package won't change much after this scratch build:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6883972
>
> I'm waiting for feedback in the fpc ticket, if all bundled() provides
> are sane. So possibly by the end of the next week I can built it. Or
> beginning of June before the mass rebuilt.

  I was expecting rebuilding the documentation would not load ipython
deps, but it did, so it should be the only issue preventing sagemath
update now:

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3246/6903246/build.log

> Greetings,
>    Tom

Thanks,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
scitech mailing list
scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scitech





[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux