Re: Updating to sagemath 6.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014-05-22 22:23 GMT+02:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
<paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2014-05-22 17:13 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 2014-05-22 13:39 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> 2014-05-22 12:32 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>> On 17/05/14 17:39, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014-05-16 21:23 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2014 12:37:19 -0300
>>>>>>>> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi sorry for adding the CC, but trying hard to get you attention :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2014-05-15 16:50 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>>>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    I am in the last steps on getting sagemath 6.2 working, so,
>>>>>>>>>> what should be done:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    It would be better to coordinate the update, so...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> o Update to pari 2.7.0 -- optional
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    At least for sagemath it is ok to rebuild pari 2.7.0; I will use
>>>>>>>>> this patch:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/sagemath/blob/master/sagemath-pari2.7.patch
>>>>>>>>> and drop this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/sagemath-nopari2.6.patch
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Note that dist-git now has pari 2.7.1 but it's not built yet; that will
>>>>>>>> change when the mass rebuild lands.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    For sagemath I can apply the patches to support pari 2.7 later, but
>>>>>>> it probably would be better to build pari earlier. At least sagemath
>>>>>>> is already broken for almost a month in rawhide due to other
>>>>>>> dependencies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Can you rebuild pari in the next few days please? This would also
>>>>>>> ensure that the mass rebuild would not let pass broken packages
>>>>>>> in case it builds packages that needs pari before pari itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've now built pari 2.7.1 in Rawhide. I kept the old library around for now
>>>>>> to avoid broken deps whilst packages are migrated to the new version.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Many thanks! Major issue now for sagemath is ipython, that I hope should
>>>>> be resolved and available soon.
>>>>
>>>> I got now the unbundling exception approved and want to update
>>>> python-tornado after the mass rebuild is over. Then I'll update
>>>> ipython as ipthon requires a newer python-tornado.
>>>>
>>>> Would also ipython 2.X be fine, or do you must have version 1.2.1?
>>>> I was already working on the 2.X series before you were writing about
>>>> version 1.2.1... :/
>>>
>>>   It starts and can start the notebook without problems, so I think it is safe.
>>> Only one warning:
>>>
>>> ---%<---
>>> $ sage
>>> ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
>>> │ Sage Version 6.2, Release Date: 2014-05-06                         │
>>> │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface.        │
>>> │ Type "help()" for help.                                            │
>>> └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
>>> WARNING: Hook shutdown_hook is deprecated. Use the atexit module instead.
>>> sage:
>>> ---%<---
>>>
>>>   I have no reasons to think it could cause problems.
>>
>> Great!
>>
>> I'll then now prepare the pyhton-tornado update for next week and next
>> is ipython.
>> Should I let you know, when I have a scratch build of ipython before
>> updating it in rawhide, so you can do the final testings?
>
>   Usually, if it is going to fail it fails at start (all I got was the
> warning), so I do
> not believe there will be any issues. But it would be ok to know about a scratch
> build and better yet when it is available in rawhide.

I think the ipython package won't change much after this scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6883972

I'm waiting for feedback in the fpc ticket, if all bundled() provides
are sane. So possibly by the end of the next week I can built it. Or
beginning of June before the mass rebuilt.

Greetings,
   Tom
_______________________________________________
scitech mailing list
scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scitech





[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux