Re: Updating to sagemath 6.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
<paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2014-05-22 12:32 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 17/05/14 17:39, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>>
>>> 2014-05-16 21:23 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2014 12:37:19 -0300
>>>> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi sorry for adding the CC, but trying hard to get you attention :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-05-15 16:50 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    I am in the last steps on getting sagemath 6.2 working, so,
>>>>>> what should be done:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    It would be better to coordinate the update, so...
>>>>>
>>>>>> o Update to pari 2.7.0 -- optional
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    At least for sagemath it is ok to rebuild pari 2.7.0; I will use
>>>>> this patch:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/sagemath/blob/master/sagemath-pari2.7.patch
>>>>> and drop this:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/sagemath-nopari2.6.patch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note that dist-git now has pari 2.7.1 but it's not built yet; that will
>>>> change when the mass rebuild lands.
>>>
>>>
>>>    For sagemath I can apply the patches to support pari 2.7 later, but
>>> it probably would be better to build pari earlier. At least sagemath
>>> is already broken for almost a month in rawhide due to other
>>> dependencies.
>>>
>>>    Can you rebuild pari in the next few days please? This would also
>>> ensure that the mass rebuild would not let pass broken packages
>>> in case it builds packages that needs pari before pari itself.
>>
>>
>> I've now built pari 2.7.1 in Rawhide. I kept the old library around for now
>> to avoid broken deps whilst packages are migrated to the new version.
>
>   Many thanks! Major issue now for sagemath is ipython, that I hope should
> be resolved and available soon.

I got now the unbundling exception approved and want to update
python-tornado after the mass rebuild is over. Then I'll update
ipython as ipthon requires a newer python-tornado.

Would also ipython 2.X be fine, or do you must have version 1.2.1?
I was already working on the 2.X series before you were writing about
version 1.2.1... :/

Greetings,
   Tom
_______________________________________________
scitech mailing list
scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scitech





[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux