2014-05-22 13:39 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2014-05-22 12:32 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On 17/05/14 17:39, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >>>> >>>> 2014-05-16 21:23 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2014 12:37:19 -0300 >>>>> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade >>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi sorry for adding the CC, but trying hard to get you attention :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> 2014-05-15 16:50 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade >>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am in the last steps on getting sagemath 6.2 working, so, >>>>>>> what should be done: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It would be better to coordinate the update, so... >>>>>> >>>>>>> o Update to pari 2.7.0 -- optional >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> At least for sagemath it is ok to rebuild pari 2.7.0; I will use >>>>>> this patch: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/sagemath/blob/master/sagemath-pari2.7.patch >>>>>> and drop this: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/sagemath-nopari2.6.patch >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Note that dist-git now has pari 2.7.1 but it's not built yet; that will >>>>> change when the mass rebuild lands. >>>> >>>> >>>> For sagemath I can apply the patches to support pari 2.7 later, but >>>> it probably would be better to build pari earlier. At least sagemath >>>> is already broken for almost a month in rawhide due to other >>>> dependencies. >>>> >>>> Can you rebuild pari in the next few days please? This would also >>>> ensure that the mass rebuild would not let pass broken packages >>>> in case it builds packages that needs pari before pari itself. >>> >>> >>> I've now built pari 2.7.1 in Rawhide. I kept the old library around for now >>> to avoid broken deps whilst packages are migrated to the new version. >> >> Many thanks! Major issue now for sagemath is ipython, that I hope should >> be resolved and available soon. > > I got now the unbundling exception approved and want to update > python-tornado after the mass rebuild is over. Then I'll update > ipython as ipthon requires a newer python-tornado. > > Would also ipython 2.X be fine, or do you must have version 1.2.1? > I was already working on the 2.X series before you were writing about > version 1.2.1... :/ It starts and can start the notebook without problems, so I think it is safe. Only one warning: ---%<--- $ sage ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Sage Version 6.2, Release Date: 2014-05-06 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface. │ │ Type "help()" for help. │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ WARNING: Hook shutdown_hook is deprecated. Use the atexit module instead. sage: ---%<--- I have no reasons to think it could cause problems. > Greetings, > Tom Thanks, Paulo _______________________________________________ scitech mailing list scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scitech
