2014-05-22 17:13 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2014-05-22 13:39 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade >>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> 2014-05-22 12:32 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>> On 17/05/14 17:39, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 2014-05-16 21:23 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2014 12:37:19 -0300 >>>>>>> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade >>>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi sorry for adding the CC, but trying hard to get you attention :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2014-05-15 16:50 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade >>>>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am in the last steps on getting sagemath 6.2 working, so, >>>>>>>>> what should be done: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It would be better to coordinate the update, so... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> o Update to pari 2.7.0 -- optional >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At least for sagemath it is ok to rebuild pari 2.7.0; I will use >>>>>>>> this patch: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/sagemath/blob/master/sagemath-pari2.7.patch >>>>>>>> and drop this: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/sagemath-nopari2.6.patch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note that dist-git now has pari 2.7.1 but it's not built yet; that will >>>>>>> change when the mass rebuild lands. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> For sagemath I can apply the patches to support pari 2.7 later, but >>>>>> it probably would be better to build pari earlier. At least sagemath >>>>>> is already broken for almost a month in rawhide due to other >>>>>> dependencies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you rebuild pari in the next few days please? This would also >>>>>> ensure that the mass rebuild would not let pass broken packages >>>>>> in case it builds packages that needs pari before pari itself. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've now built pari 2.7.1 in Rawhide. I kept the old library around for now >>>>> to avoid broken deps whilst packages are migrated to the new version. >>>> >>>> Many thanks! Major issue now for sagemath is ipython, that I hope should >>>> be resolved and available soon. >>> >>> I got now the unbundling exception approved and want to update >>> python-tornado after the mass rebuild is over. Then I'll update >>> ipython as ipthon requires a newer python-tornado. >>> >>> Would also ipython 2.X be fine, or do you must have version 1.2.1? >>> I was already working on the 2.X series before you were writing about >>> version 1.2.1... :/ >> >> It starts and can start the notebook without problems, so I think it is safe. >> Only one warning: >> >> ---%<--- >> $ sage >> ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ >> │ Sage Version 6.2, Release Date: 2014-05-06 │ >> │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface. │ >> │ Type "help()" for help. │ >> └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ >> WARNING: Hook shutdown_hook is deprecated. Use the atexit module instead. >> sage: >> ---%<--- >> >> I have no reasons to think it could cause problems. > > Great! > > I'll then now prepare the pyhton-tornado update for next week and next > is ipython. > Should I let you know, when I have a scratch build of ipython before > updating it in rawhide, so you can do the final testings? Usually, if it is going to fail it fails at start (all I got was the warning), so I do not believe there will be any issues. But it would be ok to know about a scratch build and better yet when it is available in rawhide. > Greetings, > Tom Thanks, Paulo _______________________________________________ scitech mailing list scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scitech
