Re: [Fedora Robotics] ROS Fuerte

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/07/2012 11:11 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 12:24 AM, Rich Mattes wrote:
>> On 06/01/2012 01:28 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
>>> I'm making progress again now that I have the ROS fork of PCL packaged
>>> up. My initial pass is to build all the deps necessary for the NXT stack
>>> (as that is my first test platform).
>>>
>>> I'm hanging out in #fedora-robotics if you want to talk about stuff
>>> there. :)
>>>
>>> ~tom
>>
>> I've been playing with packaging stacks based off of your example, and
>> I got three more or less done.  I've edited the wiki with which
>> packages are completed and posted thus far[1], we can add stacks to it
>> as we go so we don't duplicate effort.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Robotics/ROS_Packaging
>>
> 
> I've been following up with a few of the problem stacks over the past
> week or so.  It looks like the next release of PCL will have the bits
> that the wg-pcl repository includes and the main source distribution
> doesn't[1].  According to the gazebo mailing list, the next release of
> gazebo should follow suit and the ROS stack should depend on the source
> distribution of gazebo and not a special patched version that is only
> available from rosinstall or the wg ubuntu repositories[2].

Great news! I saw the PCL emails, thank you so much for doing that. Will
we still need to build two versions of PCL once this happens
(admittedly, we could do this from within the same source package, I
suppose), or will the Fedora system PCL be built against ROS?

> ROS groovy is due out around October[3], which is after the f18 feature
> freeze, but I think we should make ROS an f18 feature and shoot for
> getting fuerte included for the f18 release.  I'm willing to handle the
> feature page and contribute to package submission, patching, and
> reviewing this summer if everyone thinks this is a workable goal.

Sure. I'm committed to this as well. I've gotten some more stacks
working since last I checked in.

So far, the biggest block has been the fact that rviz uses a Ogre module
that Fedora doesn't have (because that module depends on NVIDIA's
non-free cg toolkit). I patched out the place where rviz uses the
module, and things _seem_ to work fine without it, but I'm not really
sure how rviz works so I can't be sure.

Aside from that, I finished all the deps needed for the nxt stack, then
patched up the nxt stack to actually work against fuerte. Right now, I'm
out at Southeast Linux Fest on an internet connection that is not much
more than wet string and tin cans, but next week, I'll upload my current
ROS packages.

Thanks,

~tom

==
Fedora Project
_______________________________________________
robotics mailing list
robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Electronics Lab]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Summer Coding]

  Powered by Linux