On 05/29/2012 11:00 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
That's true. I guess locking dependencies to rosdistro name is a lot easier than doing package versions.On 05/29/2012 06:34 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/ros/ Great! I didn't get as much time as I'd have liked to try PCL today. I did pull the source from trunk and make a test package with it, the results are as follows: A normal build of PCL from trunk has the same ROS perception_pcl compilation issues as the stock 1.5.1 build of PCL. When I built PCL from trunk with -DUSE_ROS=ON, it has the same issues as when I do the -DUSE_ROS=ON build of PCL 1.5.1 (specifically, it can't find headers). The Ubuntu dpkg has custom ROS headers which replace the missing PCL headers, but I'm reluctant to just chunk them in place, because I don't know if there is other non-header ROS specific codechanges that I'd need. Tim, do you know how to build the magic "ROS" PCL? :) I believe I found the repository for the "ROS" pcl: https://github.com/wg-debs/pcl This tree includes the ModelCoefficients and friends that are missing from upstream pcl. Rich |
_______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
