Re: use disttag ".1" for devel to avoid confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.06.2007 19:20, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:11:14PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 04.06.2007 18:56, Axel Thimm wrote:
>  [...]
>> /me more and more gets the feeling people don't understand what I'm up
>> to; of I'm really missing something here.
> /me thinks you should just fast forward to F9 and try to submit a
> package with your model to see what's wrong.

Could you please use the example I gave in reply to Jesse to show me
"what's wrong"?

> /me also thinks you should start testing release ids of "1.1" vs "1" to
> id some more flaws in this.

What are you up to? "1.1" is of course higher then ".1"

CU
thl

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux