On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 11:20:47 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > The idea to use ".1" as disstag for devel (discusses weeks ago) still > > stands. > > > > The idea in short: x.1 is higher then x.fc7 and avoid the confusion if a > > package doesn't get rebuild during a devel cycle; and if there later is > > a update after releases x simply gets increased -- so there would no > > need to got for "x.2". > > > > I can outline the idea further if anybody is interested. > > I'm really really against playing games with dist tags like this. Just for > the record. And it's just replacing .fc8, .fc9 with .1, .2, not really helpful. Not to mention that it breaks all dotted releases. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpK0ZHx1FiYp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
