On 04.06.2007 18:10, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Monday 04 June 2007 11:20:47 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> The idea to use ".1" as disstag for devel (discusses weeks ago) still >>> stands. >>> The idea in short: x.1 is higher then x.fc7 and avoid the confusion if a >>> package doesn't get rebuild during a devel cycle; and if there later is >>> a update after releases x simply gets increased -- so there would no >>> need to got for "x.2". >>> I can outline the idea further if anybody is interested. >> I'm really really against playing games with dist tags like this. Just for >> the record. > And it's just replacing .fc8, .fc9 with .1, .2, not really > helpful. Not to mention that it breaks all dotted releases. No. As I wrote (and you quoted it; see above): "so there would no need to got for "x.2". Cu thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
