On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 04.06.2007 18:10, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Monday 04 June 2007 11:20:47 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>> The idea to use ".1" as disstag for devel (discusses weeks ago) still > >>> stands. > >>> The idea in short: x.1 is higher then x.fc7 and avoid the confusion if a > >>> package doesn't get rebuild during a devel cycle; and if there later is > >>> a update after releases x simply gets increased -- so there would no > >>> need to got for "x.2". > >>> I can outline the idea further if anybody is interested. > >> I'm really really against playing games with dist tags like this. Just for > >> the record. > > And it's just replacing .fc8, .fc9 with .1, .2, not really > > helpful. Not to mention that it breaks all dotted releases. > > No. As I wrote (and you quoted it; see above): "so there would no > need to got for "x.2". You either have F9 go ".2" (if F8 is ".1") or you would had killed the usefulness of disttags altogether, so either way it's broken. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpzUBFHRjW9w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
