On 04.06.2007 18:56, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 04.06.2007 18:10, Axel Thimm wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >>>> On Monday 04 June 2007 11:20:47 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>>> The idea to use ".1" as disstag for devel (discusses weeks ago) still >>>>> stands. >>>>> The idea in short: x.1 is higher then x.fc7 and avoid the confusion if a >>>>> package doesn't get rebuild during a devel cycle; and if there later is >>>>> a update after releases x simply gets increased -- so there would no >>>>> need to got for "x.2". >>>>> I can outline the idea further if anybody is interested. >>>> I'm really really against playing games with dist tags like this. Just for >>>> the record. >>> And it's just replacing .fc8, .fc9 with .1, .2, not really >>> helpful. Not to mention that it breaks all dotted releases. >> No. As I wrote (and you quoted it; see above): "so there would no >> need to got for "x.2". > You either have F9 go ".2" (if F8 is ".1") or you would had killed the > usefulness of disttags altogether, so either way it's broken. No, you don't have to. It can stay at ".1" forever; if you update something for devel and/or a release distribution just increase the portion left of the disttag -- that's what we do in any case. /me more and more gets the feeling people don't understand what I'm up to; of I'm really missing something here. CU knurd -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
