On 04.06.2007 16:13, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Brian Pepple wrote: >> On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 14:42 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:08:23AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >>>> /topic RELENG-Meeting - Freeze Policy - JesseKeating >>> I would suggest to consider at least one full rebuild [1] before the >>> final freeze (e.g. as part of the pre-freeze process) and of course to >>> allow for enough time between the freeze and the GA to shake out any >>> bugs that will surface by that process. >> This is on FESCo's schedule to discuss after F7 was released. > Note that this has caused mass confusion as I thought it would. It is > not just about technical requirements. The idea to use ".1" as disstag for devel (discusses weeks ago) still stands. The idea in short: x.1 is higher then x.fc7 and avoid the confusion if a package doesn't get rebuild during a devel cycle; and if there later is a update after releases x simply gets increased -- so there would no need to got for "x.2". I can outline the idea further if anybody is interested. Cu thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
