On 04.06.2007 17:30, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 11:27 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Monday 04 June 2007 11:20:47 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> The idea to use ".1" as disstag for devel (discusses weeks ago) still >>> stands. >>> The idea in short: x.1 is higher then x.fc7 and avoid the confusion if a >>> package doesn't get rebuild during a devel cycle; and if there later is >>> a update after releases x simply gets increased -- so there would no >>> need to got for "x.2". >>> I can outline the idea further if anybody is interested. >> I'm really really against playing games with dist tags like this. Just for >> the record. /me would prefer to have a more detailed answer... But well, not that important. I don't care that much about that idea, but I think it could nicely solve the problems at hand. > I thought this had been thoroughly shot down already ? No, it was agreed on to let FESCo revisit that after F7 is out. CU thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
