On 04.06.2007 19:14, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 13:11:14 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> /me more and more gets the feeling people don't understand what I'm up >> to; of I'm really missing something here. > Show some examples then, flowing form rawhide to release to next rawhide, with > bump releases in between. Let's say we introduced that ".1" disttag some months ago: 20070415 - FC-6: foo-1.0-1.fc6 - rawhide: foo-1.0-1.1 (Note that ".1" is higher than ".fc6" in rpm ENVR comparisons afaics) 20070515 - rebuild in devel - FC-6: foo-1.0-1.fc6 (unchanged) - rawhide: foo-1.0-2.1 20070531 - F-7 release - FC-6: foo-1.0-1.fc6 (unchanged) - F-7: foo-1.0-2.1 (copied from rawhide) - rawhide: foo-1.0-2.1 (Note that F-7 and rawhide have the same package now, but that's normal and would have happened with a disttag "fc7" as well ) 20070631 - new upstream release - FC-6: foo-1.1-1.fc6 - F-7: foo-1.1-1.fc7 - rawhide: foo-1.1-1.1 20070815 - mass rebuild in rawhide - FC-6: foo-1.1-1.fc6 (unchanged) - F-7: foo-1.1-1.fc7 (unchanged) - rawhide: foo-1.1-2.1 20071031 - F-8 release - FC-6: foo-1.1-1.fc6 (unchanged) - F-7: foo-1.1-1.fc7 (unchanged) - F-8: foo-1.1-2.1 (copied from rawhide) - rawhide: foo-1.1-2.1 20071130 - rebuild in rawhide against a dep - FC-6: foo-1.1-1.fc6 (unchanged) - F-7: foo-1.1-1.fc7 (unchanged) - F-8: foo-1.1-2.1 (unchanged) - rawhide: foo-1.1-3.1 (Note that relase of ".3" is higher then ".2") Makes more sense now? CU thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly