On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 00:36 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Christopher Stone wrote: > > On 3/20/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Christopher Stone wrote: > >> > On 3/20/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Why does games SIG require a separate mailing list? > >> > > >> > For the same reason any SIG should have their own list. > >> > >> That is not a good reason consider no SIG except games has its own > >> mailing list. > > > > I wouldn't say that. > > > > Fedora-perl-devel-list -> perl SIG > > Fedora-music-list -> music and media production SIG > > Fedora-security-list -> security SIG > > Fedora music list is not related to the music > SIG but was originally created to coordinate on the merge of Planet > CCRMA into Fedora Extras. Well, the media production SIG's main goal so far has been to merge as much of planet CCRMA in as possible, seeing as Fernando has already packaged damn near everything out there. :) The list was created before I attempted to name the SIG with a slightly wider scope. Admittedly, the media SIG has been a bit lacking in strong leadership. All its members seem to be rather busy people. School keeps me rather busy for one. ;P Anyway, I think its perfectly reasonable to leave the decision as to whether or not the SIG needs its own list to the SIG itself, without having to justify it to anyone else. Worst comes to worst, SIGs will just start their own lists outside the Fedora infrastructure if they aren't allowed to do it within.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
