On 3/20/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Warren Togami schrieb: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThorstenLeemhuis/MailingListReorganization >> But I think it doesn't make to much sense to discuss that now -- I'd say >> we should discuss this again in detail when we are getting closer to >> actually realizing it (e.g. maybe four weeks from now; or after F7 is out). > I agree it is not a high priority to discuss this now, but please do not > assume there is widespread agreement to make these changes happen. > I believe this has been a case where silence != agreement. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-December/msg00104.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-December/msg00230.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-January/msg00104.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00732.html That are probably about 100 mails about the topic. And, as I wrote, I even got a "Looks very sane to me." https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00735.html -- I marked that day in my calendar ;-) But seems your don't like the plan that got worked out so far. That's fine. Feel free to work out something else.
I can speak on the behalf of the games SIG and hereby declare that the fedora-games-list should stay. Please take all references of fedora-games-list off your mailing list reorg doc. Thanks, Christopher Stone (on behalf of entire games SIG) -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
