Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Christopher Stone wrote:
On 3/20/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why does games SIG require a separate mailing list?
For the same reason any SIG should have their own list.
That is not a good reason consider no SIG except games has its own
mailing list.
If it is packaging details it should be in fedora-packaging list. Other
details could be in fedora-devel list. In other words what do you
discuss in fedora-games list that doesnt fit into any existing other
Fedora lists?
To me the Games SIG is a fantastic example of a "SIG done right": a very
dynamic and active group that essentially created their own
sub-community. The smaller size makes it easier to define games-specific
packaging standard, contributes to faster package reviews, and so on. I
don't know about "should", but it seems to me if SIG members feel they
need their own list, why not.
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
