Re: fonts packages review and conffile-without-noreplace-flag warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 08:00 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 27 mars 2007 à 22:26 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> 
> > If the font is removed, then the config file has to be updated.  But the
> > thing is that the user intiates all of these actions.
> 
> Bzzt
> - when you bundle lots of different fonts in a single package the user
> can't control fonts at the rpm level, since the bundle will always exist
> but with different contents (that's a big problem with fonts-region
> packages)

Bundling multiple, not directly related items together in a single RPM
is just plain wrong in any case. Each font should be split into its own
package, and the "fonts-japanese" package can be a meta-package that
depends on them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux