Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:32:16 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
FESCO voted to ratify this process during last Thursday's meeting.
I am posting this on record to reflect the minor changes to the flag
treatment. Next I will update documentation.
Changes since Version 3:
Well, again I ask the same question:
Some questions.
How does this work with the renamed packages or packages of which
the maintainer changed several times from initial?
Plus: the original package submitter and reviewer(s) receive bugzilla
spam
when old closed tickets are reused for requesting ownership changes.
And.. Thorsten asked the case in that the package was imported from
fedora.us or freshrpms.net, in which the original bugzilla ticket
does not exist.
I suppose nothing stops you from filing a new bug in order to request a
CVS change.
Moreover, writing a request on the old bugzilla ticket changes the
status of "Last Changed" meaninglessly, which may cause some problems
when someone wants to use this information.
The history however keeps track of those previous states.
Can we just accept that we are limited by the current tools?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/PackageDatabase
Please use your ideas of what the process needs and contribute to the
design and implementation of the Package Database project.
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
