On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:32:16 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Warren Togami wrote: > > FESCO voted to ratify this process during last Thursday's meeting. I am > > posting this on record to reflect the minor changes to the flag > > treatment. Next I will update documentation. > > > > Changes since Version 3: > > Well, again I ask the same question: > > Some questions. > How does this work with the renamed packages or packages of which > the maintainer changed several times from initial? > > * Well, there may be the case that the name of the package changed > several times (this especially happens for new packages) > * Maintainers also change. > * After some long time, the "current" maintainer askes, "well, > where is the initial review request?" This becomes a trouble > especially when the previous maintainer is missing, some people > (like sponsors) puts the package into "orphaned" category, > and then some other fedorabugs member takes over the maintainership > (and at the time the name of the package changed from initial). Plus: the original package submitter and reviewer(s) receive bugzilla spam when old closed tickets are reused for requesting ownership changes. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
