On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 17:09 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > FESCO Members, I would like this process to be ratified in order to get > rid of CVSSyncNeeded. If you think the process below should be adjusted > before ratification, please reply with comments. This has NOTHING to do > with the review process which must be fixed independently. I'll +1 this. Seems to be more streamlined than CVSSyncNeeded. My only question is, who are the CVS admins and do we need a couple more to help with the workload? josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
