Warren Togami wrote:
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
+1 from me. The only question I'd have is whether it would be
feasible to use Fedora account system IDs instead of email addresses
for those who don't want to expose their addresses. (Those who insist
on using a different address in bugzilla and the account system would
just have to deal, of course.)
I agree it would be superior to use the FAS account names everywhere,
and have services that need something different to need to deal with it
somehow. (Currently we have a tiny hard-coded e-mail to e-mail mapping
in the ACL handling code.)
This however would be another change to existing code that is live. With
other big changes happening, I don't know if it is wise to change this
many things at once?
A counter-argument however would be... does only owners.list -> CVS ACL
use the Bugzilla address and nothing else? If so, why not change it now
before this new policy goes live.
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/owners/?root=extras
I suppose also that it is too easy for e-mail addresses to be harvested
from places like this too.
I'll look into how difficult it would be to reverse the mapping and use
FAS names in owners.list instead of Bugzilla. This might help to simply
some things... although it would still need a hard-coded mapping hack in
order to allow for the few people who have e-mail addresses that don't
match.
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
