Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
+1 from me. The only question I'd have is whether it would be feasible to use Fedora account system IDs instead of email addresses for those who don't want to expose their addresses. (Those who insist on using a different address in bugzilla and the account system would just have to deal, of course.)
I agree it would be superior to use the FAS account names everywhere, and have services that need something different to need to deal with it somehow. (Currently we have a tiny hard-coded e-mail to e-mail mapping in the ACL handling code.)
This however would be another change to existing code that is live. With other big changes happening, I don't know if it is wise to change this many things at once?
A counter-argument however would be... does only owners.list -> CVS ACL use the Bugzilla address and nothing else? If so, why not change it now before this new policy goes live.
Warren Togami wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
