On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 15:45 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote: > > The problem is two fold: > > 1) You can't use Fedora standards for the RHL releases, only for the > Fedora releases. You are correct. However Fedora Legacy originally was just for Fedora. It was my choice and the choice of other users to extend the Legacy project to the RHL releases. To be perfectly honest, I'm not all that interested in maintaining these RHL releases, but the community seems to be for now. > 2) This is a major change to the tenents that FL was founded on. Any such > change must be by consensus. We must establish if there is a consensus or > not. Correct. We have some of that, although with some misunderstanding on many sides (; Honestly I haven't seen enough naysayers yet to discard this shortened timeout policy. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
