Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 02:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Seems to be a misunderstanding here. There are separate repositories
for
testing and general legacy updates. Yes?
He is speaking in virtual terms. Since we would introduce a timeout, he
is afraid that the quality of packages coming into released will be
lower than it is right now, and be considered "testing" packages.
IMHO the quality of packages hitting updates-testing is pretty on par
with the quality of packages hitting Fedora updates. So I'm not so sure
what the problem is here.
The problem is two fold:
1) You can't use Fedora standards for the RHL releases, only for the
Fedora releases.
2) This is a major change to the tenents that FL was founded on. Any such
change must be by consensus. We must establish if there is a consensus or
not.
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
Go Longhorns!
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
