On Sunday 12 February 2006 12:17, Pekka Savola wrote: > Hi, > > It seems there's rather strong agreement for this. Yep. (From me) > Unless I hear major objections in two days, I'll start the two-week > clock (from today) for all the pending packages. Cool! > After that I'll also update the Wiki entry for QaVerify unless someone > else has done it. > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > >>> I have proposed something simpler, and still do: > >>> > >>> 1) every package, even without any VERIFY QA votes at all, will be > >>> released automatically in X weeks (suggest: X=2). > >>> > >>> exception: at package PUBLISH time, the packager and/or publisher, > >>> if they think the changes are major enough (e.g., non-QAed patches > >>> etc.), they can specify that the package should not be > >>> automatically released. > >>> > >>> 2) negative reports block automatic publishing. > >>> > >>> 3) positive reports can speed up automatic publishing (for example: 2 > >>> VERIFY votes --> released within 1 week, all verify votes: > >>> released immediately after the last verify) > >>> > >>> There is no need (IMHO) to grade packages to more or less critical > >>> ones. Every QA tester and eventual package user uses his or her own > >>> value judgment. If (s)he fears that the (potentially untested) > >>> automatic update would break the system, (s)he would test it before > >>> two weeks are over. > >>> > >>> Publishing positive reports can be made simpler but that probably > >>> isn't on the critical path here. > > > > I agree to this. > > > > Marc > > > > -- > Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the > Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- "I kept looking around for somebody to solve the problem. Then I realized I am somebody" -Anonymous -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
