On Monday 13 February 2006 03:48, David Eisenstein wrote: > Doing things this way may have the unfortunate effect of pretty much doing > away with QA Testing, though. If a package is going to be released two > weeks from when it is pushed to updates-testing, regardless of whether or > not it has been tested, people may end up saying, "Why bother?" I'd guess the opposite: those who actually WANT to test the packages will have a fire lit under their backside to do the testing in a timeframe that's relevant. I'd rather err on the side of security. -Ben -- "I kept looking around for somebody to solve the problem. Then I realized I am somebody" -Anonymous -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
