Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 22:34 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
The current policy change proposal was about reducing the amount of QA
for moving updates-testing packages to updates.
So, I'm not sure why we're having this conversation..
It is just a case of misunderstanding. Generic terms regarding QA can
muddy the waters between updates-testing QA (phase 2?) and package
source QA (phase 1?).
NO!
A proposal was made to effectively remove any need for QA by accepting
packages without any QA. There is no misunderstanding. This was proposed
on the list. Until just a few minutes ago, no one said it was dead, so
it was still a valid point of conversation. Now it is dead, and can RIP.
But it was not a misunderstanding, it was a real proposal made to the list.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
Go Longhorns!
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
