On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 12:54 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
There has been talk the last couple days of doing away with QA to get it
to the updates-testing. This is what I was referencing, not the current
setup.
That is something I will not agree to. However the timeout period is,
it strikes a balance. If we see too many packages get released w/out QA
by the time the timeout hits, then that is very good indication that we
can drop that platform.
There has been little or no discussion or proposals regarding doing
away with QA to get to updates-testing, except for a couple of
misunderstandings and an idea about "trusted fedora legacy [core]
members" who could create updates-testing packages on their own (but
there wasn't much discussion on that).
The current policy change proposal was about reducing the amount of QA
for moving updates-testing packages to updates.
So, I'm not sure why we're having this conversation..
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
