Re: Atomic 2 week releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:26:42PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> We are on the hook for an Atomic Host release for F22, but I think I'd
> rather message why we're putting our weight behind a rapid-release host
> based on Fedora than dealing with two competing Fedora-based offerings.

Has the spinner deciding whether the rapid-release host will be based
on Rawhide or on $current come to a definitive rest yet?

If the focus is on Rawhide, and we don't have interest / resources in
keeping the $current branch up to date, I share Joe's concern — not
just for confusion due to too many options, but also because in that
case $current would almost always be the wrong choice (lagging CentOS
and even RHEL). I think this would weigh heavily towards presenting
that rawhide-based output on its own atomic.fpo home, because if
$current is really going to be $outofdate, new users _will_ inevitably
get the wrong thing.

If development is done in Rawhide but also released to $current on a
two-week cycle, I might have other worries, but this wouldn't be one of
them. :)


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux