Re: Atomic 2 week releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:37:28PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Please consider this in-depth.  A Spin might sound good for a number
> of reasons and those might be the most important factor.  However at
> the moment with Atomic being a deliverable of the Cloud Edition, its
> placement in the various websites and promotion is rather high.  The
> Spins are not at the same level as the Editions in terms of reach and
> impact.  Atomic could make its own promotion through various means,
> but get.fedoraproject.org is not going to list Workstation, Server,
> Cloud, and Atomic if it moves to a Spin.

So, following the parallel thread on the CentOS devel list...
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-March/012961.html

I think part of this decision fits into how ready we are to promote
Fedora Atomic as a user solution as opposed to a development / hacking
target. If it's still mostly the former, it might be _better_ to not
over-promote it in that way.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux