Re: dnf migration period

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:10:50PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 03/13/2015 03:05 PM, David Gay wrote:
> > I don't see a problem with keeping both installed alongside each other
> > for now, as long as people are aware that they *need* to migrate to dnf.
> > We don't want a Python 2 -> 3 "migration period". :P
> 
> One release cycle should do it.
> 
> Ideally we would have messaged this very loudly last release cycle. I
> feel like I dropped the ball a bit not making it a core part of the
> release announcement.


Either way Fedora as a whole should take a consistent approach. I
think if we deliberately add yum to our kickstart then the other
products should do the same (even if it is currently being brought in
by a dependency in some products already). I don't think we should
rely on a side-effect for it to get included or not included.

Dusty
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux