Re: dnf migration period

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/13/2015 03:05 PM, David Gay wrote:
> I don't see a problem with keeping both installed alongside each other
> for now, as long as people are aware that they *need* to migrate to dnf.
> We don't want a Python 2 -> 3 "migration period". :P

One release cycle should do it.

Ideally we would have messaged this very loudly last release cycle. I
feel like I dropped the ball a bit not making it a core part of the
release announcement.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux