----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Michael P. McGrath" <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:16:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Atomic 2 week releases
>
> On 03/13/2015 02:04 PM, Michael P. McGrath wrote:
> > I get that there are several offerings that Fedora has, I don't feel
> > compelled to list them all on projectatomic.io to people who likely won't
> > have the information to make an informed decision anyway. We pick one
> > for them, give a few word description on what it is, and set them loose.
>
> But people will find the Fedora offerings through other channels, then
> wind up on ProjectAtomic and wonder why the documentation there doesn't
> fit what they have (as one example).
>
> I'm not arguing against the alignment of Fedora == newest, CentOS ==
> stable, RHEL == Supported. I'm saying I think it would benefit us all to
> align on one Atomic offering from Fedora rather than having competing
> Fedora-based offerings that are going to be misunderstood / hard to
> clarify.
>
Perhaps we're already aligned then. What would Fedora pick as its 'best'
Atomic release and how often does it get released?
-Mike
> (Not to mention dilute efforts w/r/t testing and promotion between
> Fedora and Project Atomic.)
>
> Best,
>
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
> jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>
>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
