On 03/13/2015 02:20 PM, Michael P. McGrath wrote: > Perhaps we're already aligned then. What would Fedora pick as its 'best' > Atomic release and how often does it get released? Not exclusively my call, of course, but I would choose the rapid-release version over a version that follows the standard Fedora release cycle. That is, of course, if we can consistently produce an Atomic host that is usable without serious breakage. We are on the hook for an Atomic Host release for F22, but I think I'd rather message why we're putting our weight behind a rapid-release host based on Fedora than dealing with two competing Fedora-based offerings. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
