On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 09:22:10AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > The age of having people manually poll web-based systems is the > past. The main methods I can think of to maintain that is dopamine > hits or charging money so they need to connect regularly to get > their money's worth. We don't have the creepiness factor to do > dopamine hits, and we're not going to charge money. Sorry for the slow reply here. I've been thinking. :) This part is actually kind of a puzzle to me. That's because I am subscribed to 68 Fedora active mailing lists, and probably another dozen that haven't had activity recently. There's no way I can let that be a "push" process, because I'd drown in the deluge. So, instead, reading my Fedora mail is alreay an intentional act where I open and go through those folders. For me, there's no real difference in that aspect. Now, I recognize I may be in a special situation here, but I don't think it's unique. I had to do this long before I was Fedora Project Leader. > Also consider someone engaged will now have to use two separate > systems, and the logic as to which system a given team is on is > non-existent, so it'll be a new guessing game for a beginning > contributor to figure out where to go. Yes, we definitely have a problem here, but I think that's happening whether we like it or not. For example, the design team really centers around discussion in Pagure tickets. Other groups are actually primarily using Telegram. We need ... well, we need Hubs, or at least Hubs Lite. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
