Re: Legal Update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:23:47 -0500
Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I personally feel that you're trying any way possible to get around
> what Legal has said.  It's very reasonable to assume that if you
> attempted to do /something/, were told that Fedora can't help you
> do /something/ but if you happen to look over /here/, that we are now
> putting context into what /here/ is and what /here/ provides.  This is
> what Legal does not want us to do.

To put it another way;  If you came to me and said you were thirsty.  I
said I don't have water, because it's illegal for me to provide you
water.  I give you a list of vendors that sell water, and also I have
this "Free alternative" link.  This link takes you to a generic looking
list of buckets, no information about what is in each bucket.  Is it
not logical that you would /assume/ that all of those buckets had water
in them?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux