On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:23:47 -0500 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I personally feel that you're trying any way possible to get around > what Legal has said. It's very reasonable to assume that if you > attempted to do /something/, were told that Fedora can't help you > do /something/ but if you happen to look over /here/, that we are now > putting context into what /here/ is and what /here/ provides. This is > what Legal does not want us to do. To put it another way; If you came to me and said you were thirsty. I said I don't have water, because it's illegal for me to provide you water. I give you a list of vendors that sell water, and also I have this "Free alternative" link. This link takes you to a generic looking list of buckets, no information about what is in each bucket. Is it not logical that you would /assume/ that all of those buckets had water in them? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board