Re: Legal Update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19.11.2007 16:09, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:23:58 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 3) Another dialog which offers the Fluendo codecs/ "Click here for 
>> alternatives"
>> 4) User chooses to click on alternatives link
>> 5) Gets directed to Fedora wiki page which has a link to RPM Fusion 
> This part smells a lot like having a "reason" why these other repos
> exist (like what kind of content are within) which is verboten.

Besides that: it smells a bit like "this solution is preferred, the
other one not". Is that what we want?

That actually a interesting point in general. E.g. if I start a new
fluendo-competition company tomorrow can I get my own codeina-like app
into Fedora? Or modify codeina so it points to my webshop as well?

IOW: Maybe we should create a webpage in the fedoraproject wiki. Then
instead of having codeina directly offering the solution for playing
popular multimedia formats let it direct users to the wiki page. Let
that one list the different solutions side by side with links to
homepage from foo and bar; those then can have "click here to use our
offerings" and "for playing baz afterwards run foobar install foobaz"

CU
knurd

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux