Paul W. Frields wrote:
Sorry if I was unclear. My point was that trying to walk this
particular legal line -- a very fine one at that -- is making the value
of our possibly-soon-to-be-published verbiage practically nil.
Are you considering the entire workflow?
1) Click on a MPEG file
2) A dialog explains why we support open non-patent encumbered formats
3) Another dialog which offers the Fluendo codecs/ "Click here for
alternatives"
4) User chooses to click on alternatives link
5) Gets directed to Fedora wiki page which has a link to RPM Fusion
website or a repo file or package (Which spot has confirmed recently
that Legal is ok with)
6) Installs software with a single click via Pirut
How is this not an advantage over the current situation?
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
