On 11/19/2007 04:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 11/19/2007 04:09 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:23:58 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
3) Another dialog which offers the Fluendo codecs/ "Click here for
alternatives"
4) User chooses to click on alternatives link
5) Gets directed to Fedora wiki page which has a link to RPM Fusion
This part smells a lot like having a "reason" why these other repos
exist (like what kind of content are within) which is verboten.
Can you explain a bit more what you mean by that? I am not sure I
understand.
3) Another dialog which offers legal stuff / Click here for
potentially illegal stuff.
4) User chooses to click on link to illegal stuff.
5) Gets redirected to Fedora wiki page with intent to get illegal stuff.
Smells of contributory infringment.
We asked Red Hat Legal and they have told us clearly what is allowed and
what I have described is what is allowed AFAIK. If we need any
clarification, we can go back and ask the real lawyers.
Read spot's mail again. You can't give a reason. You can say general
things such as "There's some other software that we don't ship which is
available here". You can't say "There's some other software that we
don't ship because of .... which is available here". Including it in a
very specific context like this seems to fall more into the latter, not
the former, and does not appear to be allowed.
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
